Why are the figures on chemical submission unreliable?

Chemical submission, which involves administering psychoactive substances without the victims' knowledge, is a growing scourge. However, the data on this phenomenon remain unreliable, hindering the implementation of targeted actions. As committed stakeholders in this fight, we want to shed light on the reasons for this inaccuracy while sharing our actions and solutions.

Underreporting: a major obstacle

Many victims hesitate to report chemical submission incidents, often out of fear of not being believed or due to a lack of clear memories. Stigma also plays a significant role. Caroline Darian, president of the association M’Endors Pas, emphasizes: “Shame and fear of judgment are major barriers to reporting.”

Through our partnerships with M’Endors Pas and Balance Ton Bar, we have supported victims by providing screening tools and raising public awareness through campaigns and articles. These actions aim to break the silence and encourage victims to file complaints.

Voluntary consumption or chemical submission?

GHB, ketamine, and alcohol, often associated with chemical submission, are also consumed recreationally, which complicates statistics. In some cases, it may be a state of chemical vulnerability resulting from voluntary consumption that exposes individuals to risks similar to chemical submission.

That is why we train various stakeholders – companies, associations, and event organizers – to respond effectively in both cases, to ensure maximum safety and prevent any risk.

Issues related to screening tests

Detecting drugs used for chemical submission is particularly complex due to their rapid elimination by the body and other technical limitations. Hair tests, which allow analysis up to several weeks after the event, remain largely inaccessible.

Committed figures: Caroline Darian and Gisèle Pélicot

The Mazan trial helped publicize the extent of chemical submission. Gisèle Pélicot, mother of Caroline Darian, played a decisive role. Her moving testimony encouraged many victims to break their silence. In collaboration with various key players, we have multiplied prevention initiatives in festive environments, distributing screening or detection tests, glass condoms, or drink protections such as anti-drug cup holders, while investing in preventive and educational projects.

Our commitments against chemical submission

We have made the fight against chemical submission a priority. Through our actions, we actively contribute to protecting and raising awareness:

• Prevention in festive settings: volunteer booths at festivals, awareness campaigns on social networks, and distribution of protective tools.
• Training: supporting companies and associations in implementing screening campaigns, raising awareness of risky behaviors, and managing potential victims.
• Solidarity actions: donations of tests and writing articles in support of associations like M’Endors Pas and Balance Ton Bar.

Conclusion: essential mobilization

Data on chemical submission remain unclear due to many obstacles: underreporting, test limitations, and legal disparities. However, thanks to the commitment of figures like Caroline Darian and Gisèle Pélicot, and our actions on the ground, significant progress is possible.

The fight against this scourge requires collective awareness, reliable tools, and appropriate victim support. Together, we can help make festive environments safer and protect individuals from this insidious threat.